For this setup it's just personal preference, but why not. If I was going to be playing longer and wanted to build a massive nuclear plant, then I'd switch to electric furnaces. (I would also stick to coal based electric power generation). If you just want to launch a rocket asap, then I'd stick with mostly steel (or even stone) furnaces. I think which is better depends a lot on what your objectives for the map are, and how long you intend to play on this map. (Note that fuels don't need supply belts) This makes it possible to use up to 210 steel furnaces on the same row effectively. It might not take long until the belt runs out of ores, but it is still possible to resupply it partway through the system from the sides. And don't say that ovens require solid fuel transport belts, because I can always use the same belt to supply the rocket fuel and the ores. Speed modules might do the trick with steel smelting, but productivity modules are a thing of the past since you can always globally increase your mining drill productivity.Įlectric funraces take up 2.25 times more space. (And with productivity modules, you can even make rocket fuel a good option.) And that is a renewable source of solid fuel. You can produce more than enough solid fuel from oil. Unless you want speedrun, but that will not work over a long run. When you need 3 inserters, additional conveyor and robot to fully operate and halt expansion. Oven required secon logistical system for coal wasting space for early game.
Especially productivity module to help maintain ores. They are space effecient and enabled using for module. What the hell? Why people still using oven over electric furnance? Oven need coal to operate, while furnance get electricity from solar panels. Gergely wrote:Which is better in general? Is it still worth replacing steel furnaces with electric furnaces?
0 kommentar(er)
